- Group home
- You must register/login in order to post into this group.
Customers, Managers, Devleopers, Apprentice and Journeyman
An understanding of Scrum and XP, along with an idea of canonical user stories and their format.
Across the Agile community there has been a lot of discussion regarding the use of technical stories. While the community seems split into two camps of for and against, the majority of extreme programmers favour to define the system using only the traditional customer focused user stories. In some cases the technical story arguments are academic, but our experience report demonstrates clearly why sticking to user stories has its benefits. Our experience using Scrum and XP has been that allowing technical stories into the process can de-rail the ability to deliver constant, measurable business value per iteration, as well as inhibit the planning process. Once technical stories are allowed, the customer and business can be alienated very quickly, especially when they have no engineering background. Furthermore, when problems occur and the technical stories begin to slip, the customer can be left in a very difficult position, not knowing how to reprioritise or direct the process. It is therefore our intention to highlight some of the pitfalls that can result from using technical stories.
Alex Vandenberg is an experienced software developer currently working as a consultant for Lab49 within the financial services sector. He helps to deliver high profile projects successfully, by using sound software engineering practices and Agile methodologies. He previously presented at the Agile 2007 conference in Washington.